criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview

criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview

Blog Article

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

۔۔۔۔واقعاتی شہادت فوجداری قانون مین درجہ بندی کے لھاظ سے کمزور حیثیت رکھتی ہے۔۔۔ جب تک واقعاتی شہادت کی تمام کڑیاں اس طریقے سے فراہم نہ کی گءی ہوں کہ ایک متواتر زنجیر کی شکل اختیار کرے اور مقتول اور قاتل کے درمیان نہ ٹوٹنے والا سلسلہ قاءم کرے تب تک سزاےموت یا تعزیری سزا /عمر قید کسی کو دینا انصاف کے اصولوں کے منافی ہے۔

Therefore, this petition is found to get not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners could search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Deterrence: The fear of severe repercussions, which include capital punishment, is meant to discourage prospective criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is essential in reducing the occurrence of intentional killings.

94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within 90 days. When the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then solution the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, since the 90 times for that department to act has already expired. About the aforesaid proposition, we have been guided via the decision of the Supreme Court from the case of Dr.

Please use one particular username and password established from the options. If it does not work please attempt the other. Every single allows single consumer access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have finished your session in Manupatra.

only around the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

Any court may perhaps search for to distinguish the present case from that of check here the binding precedent, to reach a different summary. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to some higher court.

Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it needs legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be generated and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent as well as case under appeal, Maybe overruling the previous case legislation by setting a different precedent of higher authority. This may perhaps happen several times because the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first from the High Court of Justice, later of the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his growth with the concept of estoppel starting inside the High Trees case.

Finally, a significant contribution of this case which was accepted for consideration via the Court under Article 184 (three), has been setting a precedent which allows for much simpler access towards the public to strategy the superior courts and the subordinate courts on environment related issues.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its opportunity to secure financial interests and maintain the integrity of your national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, a comprehensive grasp of those changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a robust legal system.

In order to preserve a uniform enforcement of your laws, the legal system adheres into the doctrine of stare decisis

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination of your current case are called obiter dicta, which constitute persuasive authority but are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[4]